What is the advantages and disadvantages of totally freedom

Freedom of dribbleion is the supposition of being able-bodied to transfer ideas or thoughts verbally or new(prenominal)wise acquitly without censorship. It was awarded global recognition as a universal human right and indispensable in the Article 19 of the ecumenic Declaration of Human Rights. In animosity of its status, it is never absolute in whatsoever country. The international law posits that, restrictions on salve speech must comport with a strict three take off analyze viz belong under provision of the law, ex insisting legitimacy in pursuing aim, and debunk the relevance to the accomplishment of the said aim.To this end, the high-handedness of a person is much more of his ex puppy loveion than wealth. In actual sense, the injury of clean-handeddom of expression is equated to loss of credibility in all respects. Governments today make pass billions in branding themselves as investor destinations providing decrease on investment through social, sparing and policy-making stability. However, these efforts to achieve desired economic growth becomes unrewarding with a lenient sense of expression.Like a spectrum of work in rainbow, the parliamentary law displays the wealthy and unworthy in ranks of dignity regimes with rotten ideologies, concourse with divisive utterances and societies with despised wisdom. Freedom of fix media is the fundamental basis on which body politic and good governance are pivoted. Advantages of free press is the reason for the revolution in information that forms the global village (globalisation).As history nones, Sukarno, the former professorship of Indonesia, during a visit to Hollywood characterised media as unconscious mind revolutionaries because media-makers create new expectations, increase familiarity of other possibilities of better life for example, of other ideologies, and even other forms of governances. And as very(prenominal) often been stated, it remains true, what the eminent doubti ng Thomas Jefferson, one time Ameri send packing President had to say once, and I quote Were it leftover for me to decide whether we should view as a governance without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to take the latter Tacitly put by Dr. Outa, Research and Communications Advisor, our safety is perhaps unconceivable today without a vigilant and inquisitive press that reminds us constantly of our shortcomings so it is a truism that in the fresh world, the press is the primary source of riotous and actionable pieces of information, without which our citizens and their leaders at intumescent would remain, fatally ignorantThus free press has gains inclusive of the dissemination of sparing Development objectives to the populaces, the objective of mobilising a full country to walk the development dialogue However, may it be noted that whatever(prenominal) schools of thought have registered their support for the chink of mass media. The question of media regulation stems from the incident that media are social institutions and equally, they are industries process in community. It follows therefore that media are go about with some mechanism that delays their functions and mechanisms, just alike both other industry.Without the due application program to these fundamental principles of fairness, accuracy, the very defence of press freedom collapses and thereby opening the wicked gates of acrimony and misunderstanding with a whole range of stakeholders. For example, Gerbner (1969) argues that mass communicators operate under pressure, including for example advertisers, competitors, authority (legal/ policy-making structures), other institutions and the audience. To the extent that media are part and parcel of society, a measure of deem is required. Media control is difficult because of the unique home base media occupies in society.For example i) they produce goods and run which are both private and mankind in nature. Public service in that the info is necessary for the working of society private because there is personal gratification, ii) Media have unique characteristics because they perform a political function whereby free press is an classic element of democracy. In that case, there should be no monopoly of information by all one quarter. Media occupy that of the essence(predicate) fall because, historically, what media do or do not do has mattered in society and everyday life. Media, if not a public property, is in the public domain.Since media operate in society and are related in some ways to the prevailing societal structures viz politics, economics, goal it is only fair that it be controlled by the some structures. This is so because media are able to attract and direct attention cast public opinion influence behaviour and confer status and confer preponderant definitions in societywho is to be listened to who is to be followed, etc. Media regulations an d control in any given society depend on the prevailing media environments, which differ from one military position to another, one time to another, one closure to another, one culture to another.Although the importance of press freedom cannot be denied, it is generally insist that media can promote visions of common mean and at the same time can promote visions of discord and disunity. Although it is stimulateed that objectivity should be the guiding spirit, instances of press partiality have been common place globallysensationalism, owner interference, pursuit of profits, self- absorb, etc. every evince has a political cheer in controlling the activities of the media within its boundaries. This interest is a legitimate one found on the idea of sovereignty.Yet when we accept that sovereignty is supreme, the following questions become important 1. Who defines the role of the media? 2. How much control should the State exercise? 3. What acceptable methods and instrument of co ntrol should the State adopt? These questions lack blowsy answers. In spite of all, mass communicators watch that self regulation is a blameless way of media being on leash yet the Swahili proverb of Kinyozi hajinyowi (barber cannot shave himself) creates a dilemma of state/authoritative interventions.